Learning Log 3
Chapter Four is all about stimulating higher order thinking during the reading process. It defines three major ways students need assistance in reaching this kind of reading: Construction of meaning, learning text structure, and improving comprehension through questions and questioning. While the chapter begins by emphasizing the importance of providing assistance during any learning activity, constructivist theory stresses that the role of the teacher is to encourage student's independence in the learning process. Constructivism (knowledge is actively constructed by the learner) helps students achieve higher order skills. Learning to identify text structure, structures such as cause and effect, analysis or chronological, enhance overall comprehension and reading becomes easier. Questions and questioning can help show if students understand the text, but it also encourages higher level thinking as they help generate meaning for readers and strengthen recall. Inferential questions are better than literal questions, which is a trap many teachers fall for. Student generated questions are also useful in stimulating higher order thinking.
Strategies for Assisting Construction of Meaning
MARSI
(Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory)
This is a self-report test of statements in which students rank themselves from 1 through 5. Teachers can then augment instruction with strategies to help strengthen weak areas. They can also do adjunct strategies (strategies done during reading). I like this test because it also helps student become more aware of their cognitive strengths and weaknesses through self-monitoring, and it's kind of like taking a quiz from a magazine: students feel less threatened and more intrigued about the results.
MAPPING (or Concept Mapping)
This graphic organizer divides major information from subordinate. It also has a lot of other benefits (see page 83-84). This is a great way to incorporate technology. www.cengagebrain.com
The "Email an Expert" idea on page 84 is a great idea. I think that having students reach out to experts is a great way to incorporate reading, writing and critical thinking skills, but also it applies things they learn in the classroom to the real world. I would definitely like to do this sort of activity with other types of professionals as well, such as athletes, political figures, artists; anything the students are interested in.
Directed Reading- Thinking Activity
The text is divided into smaller sections so students can focus on higher order thinking, such as making, altering or confirming predictions. I don't recall ever seeing a DR-TA, as a pre-service teacher or a student. I'm really confused on how it works and why it's a useful strategy.
Reciprocal Teaching
Like with the DR-TA, Reciprocal Teaching uses small segments of text. The teacher and students work together to comprehend the text, as the roles of teacher/student are reversed. This also utilizes group roles. I am convinced this strategy is useful in teaching because of the following statement: "Reciprocal teaching provides assistance to students as they read and significantly improves achievement in both regular classrooms and with students with disabilities" (page 93).
Strategies for Assisting Text Structure
Mystery Clue Game
This is a really fun idea. Students in each group receive a card with a clue (clues arranged chronologically to lead to an event). Each student reads their clue to the group members, encouraging oral reading skills, and the group uses critical thinking skills to arrange the clues in a specific sequence that is meaningful and therefore they solve the mystery. My only qualm is that I have been told that it's not always good to prod poor readers to read aloud, but maybe since it's in a game format, it will be less intimidating.
Organizational Charts (see pages 96-99):
1. Pattern Guides
2. 3+ Level Study Guides
3. Organizational Jot Charts
Strategies for Assisting Questions and Questioning
The Question-Answer Relationship
This strategy seems to be designed to help the teacher devise good questions, but I'm still a bit confused about it. It involves a four-level taxonomy:
1. Right there
2. Think and search
3. The author and you
4. On your own
